Property Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Guide To Dilapidations Issues

 
Introduction Information Sheets The Team
Services Articles
    Latest News
Registration Form

GUIDE TO DILAPIDATIONS ISSUES

What is the standard of repair?
>>more>>
How should breaches be established? >>more>>
How should a claim be prepared? >>more>>
What are the limits on a claim? >>more>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is the standard of repair ?
Consider the extent of the repairing obligations imposed by the lease. Bear in mind that:

an obligation to keep a property in repair will generally require a tenant to put the property into repair;
when assessing the appropriate standard of repair, the Court will consider the age, character and locality of the premises;
a liability for repair does not usually involve making improvements;
inherent defects do not generally constitute disrepair, but defects could still cause disrepair for which the tenant is liable;
any Schedule of Condition attached to the lease will restrict the extent of the repairs required.


How should breaches be established?

Landlords and tenants can establish whether there has been a breach of the repairing obligations by instructing a surveyor to inspect the property and prepare a Schedule of Dilapidations.

For Schedules prepared for service on a defaulting party, the Schedule should identify the breaches, i.e. the items which do not meet the standard of repair required by the lease, and specify the appropriate remedies required. Photographs and/or video evidence are helpful for proving breach.

How should a claim be prepared?
Landlords should consider the standards set down by the draft dilapidations pre-action protocol for terminal dilapidations claims - see www.pla.org.uk for full details. The protocol is not part of the Civil Procedure Rules but the Court may have regard to the standards set down by the protocol when assessing whether the parties have behaved reasonably in dealing with a dispute.

The protocol only aims to set out best practice and rigid compliance is not required - consider whether the detailed steps set down by the protocol are required in your particular case.

In accordance with the protocol, landlords will probably want to:

Serve a Schedule of Dilapidations within a reasonable time after the expiry of the tenancy, ideally not more than 2 months later. (N.B. If the landlord wants the tenant to carry out the necessary repairs before the tenant vacates the property, it should obviously serve a Schedule well before the expiry of the lease.)
Arrange a meeting with the tenant to discuss the Schedule.
Ask the tenant to respond to the Schedule within a reasonable time - the protocol suggests that the tenant should respond within 2 months after service of the Schedule.

Depending on the circumstances, landlords may also want to follow these parts of the protocol:

Allow space in the Schedule of Dilapidations for the tenant's comments to be incorporated into it.
Set out the claim in a separate document, with a clear breakdown and summary of the claim.
If the repair works have not yet been carried out, arrange for a Section 18(1) valuation to be prepared and served on the tenant.

What are the limits on a claim?
Bear in mind section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927.

The two elements of section 18 are known as the two "limbs":

The first limb:
Any damages for dilapidations will be limited to the amount by which the value of the landlord's reversion is diminished as a result of the tenant's breaches (see Ultraworth Limited v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation plc & Buhler Limited (2000)); and

The second limb:
A landlord cannot recover damages where it intends to pull down the property at or shortly after the termination of the tenancy, or for repairs where the landlord intends to carry out structural alterations within that same period which would make those repairs by the tenant valueless.

For the first limb, the court or arbitrator will look at the value of the whole of the landlord's reversion and not simply the landlord's reversion of the premises. It can be difficult to prove that there has been a diminution in the value of a reversion where only part of a building is in disrepair.

When considering the second limb, the main points to consider are:

when any works are to be carried out (i.e. are the works to be carried out "at or shortly after the termination of the tenancy"?);
whether the works are sufficiently comprehensive to fall within the ambit of the second limb; and
whether the landlord had formed the relevant level of intention to carry out the works at the time the lease ended.

 

For further information or advice please contact propertylitigation@charlesrussell.co.uk

These notes represent only an outline summary of relevant principles and detailed advice should always be sought in particular cases.